[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F9C155.3050309@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 08:01:41 -0700
From: David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NMI watchdog triggering during load_balance
On 3/5/15 9:52 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> CPU970 attaching sched-domain:
>> domain 0: span 968-975 level SIBLING
>> groups: 8 single CPU groups
>> domain 1: span 968-975 level MC
>> groups: 1 group with 8 cpus
>> domain 2: span 768-1023 level CPU
>> groups: 4 groups with 256 cpus per group
>
> Wow, that topology is horrid. I'm not surprised that your box is
> writhing in agony. Can you twiddle that?
>
twiddle that how?
The system has 4 physical cpus (sockets). Each cpu has 32 cores with 8
threads per core and each cpu has 4 memory controllers.
If I disable SCHED_MC and CGROUPS_SCHED (group scheduling) there is a
noticeable improvement -- watchdog does not trigger and I do not get the
rq locks held for 2-3 seconds. But there is still fairly high cpu usage
for an idle system. Perhaps I should leave SCHED_MC on and disable
SCHED_SMT; I'll try that today.
Thanks,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists