linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/8] pmem: Submission of the Persistent memory block device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1425667065.32009.7.camel@theros.lm.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:37:45 -0700
From:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Roger C. Pao" <rcpao.enmotus@...il.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] pmem: Submission of the Persistent memory block device

On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 12:32 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> There are already NvDIMMs and other Persistent-memory devices in the market, and
> lots more of them will be coming in near future.
> 
> Current stack is coming along very nice, and filesystems support for leveraging this
> technologies has been submitted to Linus in the DAX series by Matthew Wilcox.
> 
> The general stack does not change:
> 	block-device
> 	partition
> 	file-system
> 	application file
> 
> The only extra care, see Matthew's DAX patches, Is the ->direct_access() API from
> block devices that enables a direct mapping from Persistent-memory to user application
> and/or Kernel for direct store/load of data.
> 
> The only missing piece is the actual block device that enables support
> for such NvDIMM chips. This is the driver we submit here.
> 
> The driver is very simple, in fact it is the 2nd smallest driver inside drivers/block
> What the driver does is support a physical contiguous iomem range as a single block
> device. The driver has support for as many as needed iomem ranges each as its own device.
> (See patch-1 for more details)
> 
> We are using this driver over a year now, In a lab with combination of VMs and real
> hardware, with a variety of hardware and vendors, and it is very stable. Actually why
> not it is so simple it does nothing almost.
> 
> The driver is not only good for NvDIMMs, It is good for any flat memory mapped
> device. We've used it with NvDIMMs, Kernel reserved DRAM (memmap= on command line),
> PCIE Battery backed memory cards, VM shared memory, and so on.
> 
> Together with this driver also submitted support for page-struct with
> Persistent-memory, so Persistent-memory can be used with RDMA, DMA, block-devices
> and so on, just as regular memory, in a copy-less manner.
> With the use of these two simple patches, we were able to set up an RDMA target
> machine which exports NvDIMMs and enables direct remote storage. The only
> "complicated" thing was the remote flush of caches because most RDMA nicks in
> Kernel will RDMA directly to L3 cache, so we needed to establish a message that
> involves the remote CPU for this. But otherwise the mapping of pmem pointer
> to an RDMA key was trivial, directly from user-mode, with no extra Kernel code.
> [The target is simple with no extra code, the RDMA client on the other hand needs
>  a special driver]
> 
> I maintain these patches on latest Kernels here:
> 	git://git.open-osd.org/pmem.git branch pmem
> 
> Thanks for reviewing
> Boaz

Hey Boaz,

Regarding the PMEM series, my group has been working on an updated
version of this driver for the past 6 months or so since I initially
posted the beginnings of this series:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/27/674

That new version should be ready for public viewing sometime in April.

It's my preference that we wait to try and upstream any form of PMEM
until we've released our updated version of the driver, and you've had a
chance to review and add in any changes you need.  I'm cool with
gathering additional feedback until then, of course.

Trying to upstream this older version and then merging it with the newer
stuff in-kernel seems like it'll just end up being more work in the end.

Thanks,
- Ross

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/