[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150306184920.GI20077@google.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:49:20 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI: pci_unignore_hotplug()
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:23:27PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Alex Williamson
> <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
> > I'd kinda like to use pci_ignore_hotplug() for devices in use by a
> > user via vfio-pci, but the interface seems only partially implemented
> > since we can only set ignore_hotplug and not clear it. This adds the
> > capability to clear the flag and applies it as seems to be appropriate
> > to the existing users. I don't have a system with power control for
> > a radeon or nouveau device, so I'd certainly appreciate testing. It
> > seems though that once the device is in D0, we've passed the critical
> > point where the device could be accidentally unplugged. Thanks,
>
> Something re-broke this recently. See:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61891
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89731
I'm not opposed to adding pci_unignore_hotplug() when we have users for it.
I don't really want to throw in the nouveau and radeon changes while there
are open issues in the same area, though.
I haven't looked at the bugzillas above. Let me know if I should.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists