[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVQF22rkZFD8VAW_xrVQOjwpej6W4TJS9gbN9B431TEKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:02:43 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@...il.com>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Markku Savela <msa@...h.iki.fi>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V2
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
>> Sorry, something about that patch-patch didn't make sense to me, but I
>> need to look more closely. My objection was that you were able to get the
>> pA capabilities into pP without them being in your pI. Your proposed
>> change didn't seem like it would fix that.
>
> Just tried to fix that. Could it be that cap_inherited is never set even
> for a binary that has
>
> christoph@...itsu-haswell:~$ getcap ambient_test
>
> ambient_test = cap_setpcap,cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw,cap_sys_nice+eip
I think that's right. fI doesn't set pI.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists