linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: divider: three exactness fixes (and a rant)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54FA0385.2060808@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:44:05 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC:	kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: divider: three exactness fixes (and a rant)

On 03/06/15 10:57, Mike Turquette wrote:
>
> Uwe,
>
> Thanks for the fixes. I'm thinking of taking all three for 4.0. I also
> agree on clk_round_rate_nearest (along with a _ceil and _floor version
> as well). That's something we can do for 4.1 probably.
>
> There are currently 3 users of CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST:
>
> Loongson
> QCOM
> ST
>
> So now is probably the right time to remove the flag if we're going to
> do it.
>
> What do you think?
>

I may have had to do divider round closest on qcom platforms because of
the problem these patches are for. I'll have to go back and look.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/