linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/38] perf tools: Handle indexed data file properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:17:04 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/38] perf tools: Handle indexed data file properly

Hi Jiri,

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:19:54PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:07:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > When perf detects data file has index table, process header part first
> > and then rest data files in a row.  Note that the indexed sample data is
> > recorded for each cpu/thread separately, it's already ordered with
> > respect to themselves so no need to use the ordered event queue
> > interface.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/session.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  tools/perf/util/session.h |  5 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > index e4f166981ff0..00cd1ad427be 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > @@ -1300,11 +1300,10 @@ fetch_mmaped_event(struct perf_session *session,
> >  #define NUM_MMAPS 128
> >  #endif
> >  
> > -static int __perf_session__process_events(struct perf_session *session,
> > +static int __perf_session__process_events(struct perf_session *session, int fd,
> >  					  u64 data_offset, u64 data_size,
> >  					  u64 file_size, struct perf_tool *tool)
> >  {
> > -	int fd = perf_data_file__fd(session->file);
> 
> why is 'fd' passed separatelly here? we have single file now
> and the only 'file::fd' we use is in session, no?

You're right, it's a leftover from the old code.  Will change.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/