[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150307003742.GH5236@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:37:42 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@...cle.com>
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vasily.isaenko@...cle.com, dave@...olabs.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/locking/locktorture: fix deadlock in
'rw_lock_irq' type
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 03:06:53AM +0300, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
> torture_rwlock_read_unlock_irq() must use read_unlock_irqrestore()
> instead of write_unlock_irqrestore().
>
> Use read_unlock_irqrestore() instead of write_unlock_irqrestore().
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@...cle.com>
Good catch! If Davidlohr has no objections, I will queue this one.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> index ec8cce2..6a2723c 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int torture_rwlock_read_lock_irq(void) __acquires(torture_rwlock)
> static void torture_rwlock_read_unlock_irq(void)
> __releases(torture_rwlock)
> {
> - write_unlock_irqrestore(&torture_rwlock, cxt.cur_ops->flags);
> + read_unlock_irqrestore(&torture_rwlock, cxt.cur_ops->flags);
> }
>
> static struct lock_torture_ops rw_lock_irq_ops = {
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists