lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:00:35 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, andrew@...n.ch,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] eeprom: Add a simple EEPROM framework for eeprom
 providers

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:45:41AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:

> +
> +	return eeprom;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eeprom_register);

This framework uses regmap but regmap is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() and this is
using EXPORT_SYMBOL().

> +int eeprom_unregister(struct eeprom_device *eeprom)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&eeprom_mutex);
> +	if (atomic_read(&eeprom->users)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&eeprom_mutex);

Atomic reads and a mutex - isn't the mutex enough?  Atomics are
generally a recipie for bugs due to the complexity in using them.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ