[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150307150035.GN28806@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:00:35 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, andrew@...n.ch,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] eeprom: Add a simple EEPROM framework for eeprom
providers
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:45:41AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> +
> + return eeprom;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eeprom_register);
This framework uses regmap but regmap is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() and this is
using EXPORT_SYMBOL().
> +int eeprom_unregister(struct eeprom_device *eeprom)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&eeprom_mutex);
> + if (atomic_read(&eeprom->users)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&eeprom_mutex);
Atomic reads and a mutex - isn't the mutex enough? Atomics are
generally a recipie for bugs due to the complexity in using them.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists