lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:35:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com> To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] omap3 crypto fixes On Sun, 8 Mar 2015, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Friday 06 March 2015 23:23:06 Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:36:32AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Are there any fixes in this series that should go into > > > v4.0-rc series, or can it all wait for v4.1? > > > > I think these all should wait for v4.1. > > > > A. > > I would suggest to include at least patches 01, 04, 06. Probably > those could go to -stable tree... but this decision is up to you. I'm not sure patch 1 is a fix. As far as I know we haven't run into any issues with it on real hardware - only on QEMU - unless you know otherwise, Pali? Are we sure that the QEMU model behavior matches the hardware? - Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists