lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:35:13 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
To:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
cc:	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] omap3 crypto fixes

On Sun, 8 Mar 2015, Pali Rohár wrote:

> On Friday 06 March 2015 23:23:06 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:36:32AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Are there any fixes in this series that should go into
> > > v4.0-rc series, or can it all wait for v4.1?
> > 
> > I think these all should wait for v4.1.
> > 
> > A.
> 
> I would suggest to include at least patches 01, 04, 06. Probably 
> those could go to -stable tree... but this decision is up to you.

I'm not sure patch 1 is a fix.  As far as I know we haven't 
run into any issues with it on real hardware - only on QEMU - unless you 
know otherwise, Pali?  Are we sure that the QEMU model behavior matches 
the hardware?


- Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists