linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] staging: sm750fb: correctly define SM750LE_REVISION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 8 Mar 2015 23:01:47 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Giedrius Statkevičius 
	<giedrius.statkevicius@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] staging: sm750fb: correctly define
 SM750LE_REVISION_ID

On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 02:59:03PM +0200, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On 2015.03.08 14:31, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > -#define SM750LE_REVISION_ID (char)0xfe
> > +#ifndef SM750LE_REVISION_ID
> > +#define SM750LE_REVISION_ID ((unsigned char)0xfe)
> > +#endif
> 
> Do you need these parantheses? Also, you can now then fix up this line
> too to avoid a redundant cast in the same patch:
> sm750_hw.c: if(share->revid == (unsigned char)SM750LE_REVISION_ID){
good idea, thanks.
that extra parentheses is for checkpatch warning of complex macro value.

i will better send a v2 of the whole series after checking that resource_size_t.

regards
sudip
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Giedrius
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/