[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7616599.hAEbVQmATE@wuerfel>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 23:52:50 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...ymobile.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] ARM: msm multiplatform support
On Thursday 05 March 2015 17:40:18 Ulf Hansson wrote:
> The goal from my side is to entirely remove this mmc driver and
> instead convert to use the mmci host driver.
>
> If I understand correctly, the current big blocker to reach that goal
> is the DMA driver, since it's not converted to the DMA engine API? Do
> you know if that's a correct statement?
Yes, I think that is correct. As I wrote in the patch description,
after we remove the serial-hs driver, msm_sdcc is the only user of the
private MSM DMA API.
I wasn't aware that this device is compatible with mmci, but that
certainly simplifies things.
> Anyway, I suppose this patchset can be considered as step in the right
> direction, even if I don't like to take patches for the msm_sdcc.c.
Ok.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists