[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54FB9FE2.5040707@fb.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 18:03:30 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <drbd-user@...ts.linbit.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] block, drbd: fix drbd_req_new() initialization
On 03/07/2015 05:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>>> mempool_alloc() does not support __GFP_ZERO since elements may come from
>>> memory that has already been released by mempool_free().
>>>
>>> Remove __GFP_ZERO from mempool_alloc() in drbd_req_new() and properly
>>> initialize it to 0.
>>
>> You should add it to mempool instead, avoid having this issue show up for
>> other folks as well. It'd be trivial to do. Normal ->alloc() should honor
>> __GFP_ZERO, just do the same manually for removing an item from the internal
>> pool.
>>
>
> Umm, it's not trivial to do and wouldn't make sense to do it. Mempools
Uhm, it would make sense, though.
> don't know the element size, in other words it wouldn't know the length to
> memset() to 0 for mempool_alloc(). It shouldn't be modified to know the
> element size since elements are allocated by the implementation of
> mempool_alloc_t and they could easily become inconsistent. This patch is
> what you want to merge, really.
>
I forgot we don't have the size in there. Then I would suggest adding a
WARN_ON() for __GFP_ZERO being set in mempool_alloc(), at the very least.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists