[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWd71SxCf9=Nh_dBSKK2ecHC=s3-2R7dZJM9PGuR7ybzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 22:51:53 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] x86: Kill E820_RESERVED_KERN
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 5:59 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm, although the bug is reported for a 3.12 kernel, I assume this is for
> stable 3.10+? If so, it should apply fine with the exception of removing
> e820_reserve_setup_data() from setup_arch() rather than
> memblock_x86_reserve_range_setup_data(). Or is it for 3.2 as well and
> needs to be completely rebased for that kernel?
For 3.10+, we will need to following patches, otherwise will have warning for
SETUP_PCI with ioremap.
for 3.2 that does not SETUP_PCI, should be ok, but will need rebase.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists