[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1425808958-17104-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 06:02:38 -0400
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...sung.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@...il.com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: wm8996: ensure lower bounds of 1 for timeout
wait_for_completion_timeout can be called with timeout == 0 due to
msecs_to_jiffies(2) == 1 for HZ < 1000 and usecs_to_jiffies(300) == 1
for all reasonable values of HZ, thus the following timeout /= 2; sets
timeout to 0. This patch simply adds a lower-bounds of 1.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
---
line numbers from wm9666.c linux-next -next-20150306
2101 /* Wait for the FLL to lock, using the interrupt if possible */
2102 if (Fref > 1000000)
2103 timeout = usecs_to_jiffies(300);
2104 else
2105 timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(2);
2106
2107 /* Allow substantially longer if we've actually got the IRQ, poll
2108 * at a slightly higher rate if we don't.
2109 */
2110 if (i2c->irq)
2111 timeout *= 10;
2112 else
2113 timeout /= 2;
2114
2115 ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&wm8996->fll_lock,
2116 timeout);
The call-path here would then be:
wait_for_completion_timeout(...,timeout)
-> wait_for_common action==schedule_timeout
-> schedule_timeout(timeout)
...
expire = timeout + jiffies;
so expire == jiffies here and the timer would expire immediately
for systems with HZ<1000 due to msecs_to_jiffies(2) == 1 and the
following timeout /= 2 -> timeout == 0, which is probably a bit
more that a "slightly higher rate".
This was only compile tested for exynos_defconfig + CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y,
SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS=m (implies CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8996=m)
Patch is against 4.0-rc2 linux-next (localversion-next is -next-20150306)
sound/soc/codecs/wm8996.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8996.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8996.c
index 24d9705..5ded102 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8996.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8996.c
@@ -2110,7 +2110,8 @@ static int wm8996_set_fll(struct snd_soc_codec *codec, int fll_id, int source,
if (i2c->irq)
timeout *= 10;
else
- timeout /= 2;
+ /* ensure timeout of atleast 1 jiffies */
+ timeout = timeout/2 ? : 1;
for (retry = 0; retry < 10; retry++) {
time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&wm8996->fll_lock,
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists