linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 0/2] perf tool: improve error handling in perf_flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon,  9 Mar 2015 13:01:14 +0100
From:	Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] perf tool: improve error handling in perf_flag_probe()

Hi,

Following the EBUSY errors reported by Jiri Olsa [1], I've tryed to
improve a bit the way perf_flag_probe() handle errors.

In case EBUSY is returned by perf_event_open(), testing the function
again without PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC is meaningless: EBUSY is not
related to close-on-exec flag, so there's nothing to confirm.

For other errors, not yet explicitly handled by perf_flag_probe(),
it's pointless to report a second error message for the same error
code: the second check should not print an error if the error is
the same as the one returned for the first check.

Changes from v0 [2]:
 - rebased on top of commit 48536c9195ae ("perf tools: Fix probing for PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC flag");
 - update a bit commit message;
 - the previous patchset was acked by Jiri[3], but I haven't
   reported Acked-by: in this updated patchset.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406908014-8312-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1410595700.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140920121438.GB15481@krava.brq.redhat.com

Yann Droneaud (2):
  perf tools: shortcut PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC probing in case of EBUSY
    error
  perf tools: report PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC probing error once

 tools/perf/util/cloexec.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Regards.

--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/