linux-kernel - Re: [patch v2] mm, hugetlb: abort __get_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <xr93r3synzqu.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 Mar 2015 05:04:25 -0700
From:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm, hugetlb: abort __get_user_pages if current has been oom killed


On Mon, Mar 09 2015, David Rientjes wrote:

> If __get_user_pages() is faulting a significant number of hugetlb pages,
> usually as the result of mmap(MAP_LOCKED), it can potentially allocate a
> very large amount of memory.
>
> If the process has been oom killed, this will cause a lot of memory to
> be overcharged to its memcg since it has access to memory reserves or
> could potentially deplete all system memory reserves.

s/memcg/hugetlb_cgroup/ but I don't think hugetlb has any
fatal_signal_pending() based overcharging.  I no objection to the patch,
but this doesn't seems like a cgroup thing, so the commit log could
stand a tweak.

> In the same way that commit 4779280d1ea4 ("mm: make get_user_pages() 
> interruptible") aborted for pending SIGKILLs when faulting non-hugetlb
> memory, based on the premise of commit 462e00cc7151 ("oom: stop
> allocating user memory if TIF_MEMDIE is set"), hugetlb page faults now
> terminate when the process has been oom killed.
>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> ---
>  v2: check signal inside follow_huegtlb_page() loop per Kirill
>
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3276,6 +3276,15 @@ long follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		struct page *page;
>  
>  		/*
> +		 * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting pages and
> +		 * potentially allocating memory.
> +		 */
> +		if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current))) {
> +			remainder = 0;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
>  		 * Some archs (sparc64, sh*) have multiple pte_ts to
>  		 * each hugepage.  We have to make sure we get the
>  		 * first, for the page indexing below to work.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/