[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA5tAkdf2=YOpq3qu1i8azTu=+kbQBsyB4Ze+qRzcE3KjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:11:54 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: intel_soc_dts_thermal binding issues
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas
<srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 08:51 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
>> > Please attach the acpidump output.
>>
>> Attached for my machine.
>>
> There is no INT3401 in the acpi dump. Also no one registered IRQ 86.
> So the request_irq failing.
> It is not a problem, this platform can't support.
> Do we want to silently bail out?
That's what I was originally suggesting, yes. People see the failing
request_irq in dmesg and think it's an error.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists