[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1425909943-14687-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:05:43 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86: entry_32.S: change ESPFIX test to not touch PT_OLDSS(%esp)
Old code was trying to avoid having three branch insns,
but instead it has a chain of six insns where each insn
depends on previos one.
And it was touching PT_OLDSS(%esp) unconditionally, even when it may
contain bogus data. Elsewhere we have to jump thru hoops
just to make sure here PT_OLDSS(%esp) is at least in a valid page.
All this just to have one branch instead of three?
The new code simply checks each condition.
All three checks can run in parallel on an out-of-order CPU.
Most of the time, none of branches will be taken.
Comparison of object code:
Old:
1e6: 8b 44 24 38 mov 0x38(%esp),%eax
1ea: 8a 64 24 40 mov 0x40(%esp),%ah
1ee: 8a 44 24 34 mov 0x34(%esp),%al
1f2: 25 03 04 02 00 and $0x20403,%eax
1f7: 3d 03 04 00 00 cmp $0x403,%eax
1fc: 74 0f je 20d <ldt_ss>
New:
1e6: 0f ba 64 24 38 11 btl $0x11,0x38(%esp)
1ec: 72 0e jb 1fc <restore_nocheck>
1ee: f6 44 24 34 03 testb $0x3,0x34(%esp)
1f3: 74 07 je 1fc <restore_nocheck>
1f5: f6 44 24 40 04 testb $0x4,0x40(%esp)
1fa: 75 0f jne 20b <ldt_ss>
Patch is run-tested.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: x86@...nel.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
index e33ba51..0a4996b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
@@ -516,16 +516,15 @@ restore_all:
TRACE_IRQS_IRET
restore_all_notrace:
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX32
- movl PT_EFLAGS(%esp), %eax # mix EFLAGS, SS and CS
- # Warning: PT_OLDSS(%esp) contains the wrong/random values if we
- # are returning to the kernel.
- # See comments in process.c:copy_thread() for details.
- movb PT_OLDSS(%esp), %ah
- movb PT_CS(%esp), %al
- andl $(X86_EFLAGS_VM | (SEGMENT_TI_MASK << 8) | SEGMENT_RPL_MASK), %eax
- cmpl $((SEGMENT_LDT << 8) | USER_RPL), %eax
CFI_REMEMBER_STATE
- je ldt_ss # returning to user-space with LDT SS
+ btl $X86_EFLAGS_VM_BIT,PT_EFLAGS(%esp)
+ jc restore_nocheck # VM set, not it
+ testb $3,PT_CS(%esp)
+ jz restore_nocheck # CPL0, not it
+ # Note: we access PT_OLDSS only when we know it exists.
+ # If PT_CS is from CPL0, it does not.
+ testb $SEGMENT_TI_MASK,PT_OLDSS(%esp)
+ jnz ldt_ss # returning to user-space with LDT SS
#endif
restore_nocheck:
RESTORE_REGS 4 # skip orig_eax/error_code
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists