[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVydzWCQ03=UDb4paT6y8_YULn08pgoYng8-oHF4ZAv7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 08:18:28 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: entry_32.S: change ESPFIX test to not touch PT_OLDSS(%esp)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
>> > That being said, what ends up in the high bits of esp when we iret
>> > to vm86 mode?
>>
>> I don't know. I guess it's time to write an actual vm86 testcase :)
>
> Btw., could you please stick it and your other testcases into
> tools/x86/tests/ or so? Having such a testsuite would ease maintenance
> considerably.
>
My excuse used to be that the test actively exploited really nasty
security issues. Then it was that I was waiting for the
infrastructure to stabilize a bit. I'll go see how it's looking now.
--Andy
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists