[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcNmfy3RS20t-+Pmn+KFtoYM+RqyCx=LgfcHaaXnzF1M5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:28:26 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: entry_32.S: change ESPFIX test to not touch PT_OLDSS(%esp)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
>> New:
>> 1e6: 0f ba 64 24 38 11 btl $0x11,0x38(%esp)
>
> btl? Really?
>
> Why isn't that just
>
> testb $2,0x3a(%esp)
>
> which is both smaller and quite a bit faster on older machines.
Ok. (I thought people won't be happy about this.)
> Or just at least *partially* do what we used to do, and make it all be
>
> movb PT_EFLAGS+2(%esp),%al
> andb $2,%al
> orb PT_CS(%esp),%al
> testb $3,%al
> je restore_nocheck
These insns must run serially. 4 cycles.
test
branch
test
branch
can execute both test/branch'es out-of-order in parallel.
2 cycles.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists