linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spmi: pmic_arb: enable build on arm64 platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:57:01 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
Cc:	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spmi: pmic_arb: enable build on arm64 platforms

Stanimir Varbanov schreef op ma 09-03-2015 om 18:53 [+0200]:
> On 02/23/2015 02:57 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > What if we just drop ARM dependency? 
> 
> I'm fine with this, Paul?

Well I'm fine with anything you do, as long as the Kconfig dependencies
make sense and the commit summary and the commit explanation match the
change. In other words: if you submit an updated patch and I don't bark
you may assume I'm fine with the change. This doesn't need an Ack on my
side anyhow (as if anything does).

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/