lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:33:17 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: cfi: reduce stack size

On Monday 09 March 2015 12:58:54 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 10:58 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The cfi_staa_write_buffers function uses a large amount of ernel stack
> 
> Typo: "ernel"

ok

> > whenever CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_32 is set, and that results in a
> > warning on ARM allmodconfig builds:
> > 
> > drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c: In function 'cfi_staa_write_buffers':
> > drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c:651:1: warning: the frame size of 1208 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > 
> > It turns out that this is largely a result of a suboptimal implementation
> > of map_word_andequal(). Replacing this function with a straightforward
> > one reduces the stack size in this function by exactly 200 bytes,
> > shrinks the .text segment for this file from 27648 bytes to 26608 bytes,
> > and makes the warning go away.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/map.h b/include/linux/mtd/map.h
> > index 5f487d776411..2d2457bee50c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mtd/map.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/map.h
> > @@ -314,7 +314,15 @@ static inline map_word map_word_or(struct map_info *map, map_word val1, map_word
> >  	return r;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define map_word_andequal(m, a, b, z) map_word_equal(m, z, map_word_and(m, a, b))
> > +static inline int map_word_andequal(struct map_info *map, map_word val1, map_word val2, map_word val3)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +	for (i=0; i<map_words(map); i++) {
> 
> Nit:
> 
> for (i = 0; i < map_words(map); i++)

It's the same as five other copies of the same loop in this file, but I've
changed this one now.

Thanks,

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ