lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54FE02C1.9090803@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:29:53 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
CC:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MTD: cfi: reduce stack size

Hello.

On 3/9/2015 10:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> The cfi_staa_write_buffers function uses a large amount of kernel stack
> whenever CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_32 is set, and that results in a
> warning on ARM allmodconfig builds:

> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c: In function 'cfi_staa_write_buffers':
> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c:651:1: warning: the frame size of 1208 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]

> It turns out that this is largely a result of a suboptimal implementation
> of map_word_andequal(). Replacing this function with a straightforward
> one reduces the stack size in this function by exactly 200 bytes,
> shrinks the .text segment for this file from 27648 bytes to 26608 bytes,
> and makes the warning go away.

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/map.h b/include/linux/mtd/map.h
> index 5f487d776411..7b5841663d4f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/map.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/map.h
> @@ -314,7 +314,15 @@ static inline map_word map_word_or(struct map_info *map, map_word val1, map_word
>   	return r;
>   }
>
> -#define map_word_andequal(m, a, b, z) map_word_equal(m, z, map_word_and(m, a, b))
> +static inline int map_word_andequal(struct map_info *map, map_word val1, map_word val2, map_word val3)
> +{
> +	int i;

    I think empty line is needed here.

> +	for (i=0; i < map_words(map); i++) {

    Could you please be consistent and surround all binary operators with 
spaces, like on the line below?

> +		if ((val1.x[i] & val2.x[i]) != val3.x[i])
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +	return 1;
> +}
[...]

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ