lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:51:20 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] fs proc: make pagemap a privileged interface

On 03/09/2015 05:03 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> A 1 to 1 blinding function like integer multiplication mudulo 2^32 by an
>> appropriate random number ought to keep from revealing page numbers or
>> page ajacencies while not requiring any changes in userspace.
>>
>> That way the revealed pfn and the physcial pfn would be different but
>> you could still use pagemap for it's intended purpose.
> 
> If this could be done in a way where it was sufficiently hard to
> expose the random number, we should absolutely do this.

We would need something which is both reversible (so that the given
offsets can still be used in /proc/kpagemap) and also hard to do a
known-plaintext-type attack on it.

Transparent huge pages are a place where userspace knows the
relationship between 512 adjacent physical addresses.  That represents a
good chunk of known data.  Surely there are more of these kinds of things.

Right now, for instance, the ways in which a series of sequential
allocations come out of the page allocator are fairly deterministic.  We
would also need to do some kind of allocator randomization to ensure
that userspace couldn't make good guesses about the physical addresses
of things coming out of the allocator.

Or, we just be sure and turn the darn thing off. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ