linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] Revert h8300 archtecture support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150310055522.GA9699@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 22:55:22 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] Revert h8300 archtecture support

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:46:54PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I rewriting h8300 support.
> 

It might possibly be better to use the term "re-introduce" instead of
rewrite or revert (as in the headline).

Also,
	s/archtecture/architecture/

in the headline.

Given that the reason for dropping the architecture in the first place was
the lack of an active maintainer, I am somewhat surprised that you don't
add one to the MAINTAINERS file.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/