[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54FEA245.4010001@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:50:29 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: socketcan@...tkopp.net,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: use sock_efree instead of own destructor
On 03/10/2015 04:48 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> It is identical to the can destructor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Thanks, applied to can-next.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists