[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150310080628.GA20314@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:06:28 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len.Brown@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Bypass legacy PIC and PIT on ACPI hardware reduced
platform
* Li, Aubrey <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> - in x86_reduced_hw_init() set 'legacy_pic' to 'null_legacy_pic'
> >>
> >> - clean up 'global_clock_event' handling: instead of a global
> >> variable, move its management into x86_platform_ops::get_clockevent()
> >> and set the method to hpet/pit/abp/etc. specific handlers that
> >> return the right clockevent device.
> >>
> >> - in your x86_reduced_hw_init() function add the hpet clockevent
> >> device to x86_platform_ops::get_clockevent, overriding the default
> >> PIT.
>
> how about this one?
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index b9e30da..70955d6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -1541,6 +1541,16 @@ int __init early_acpi_boot_init(void)
> */
> early_acpi_process_madt();
>
> + /*
> + * Override x86_init functions and bypass legacy pic
> + * in hardware-reduced ACPI mode
> + */
> + if (acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware) {
> + x86_init.timers.timer_init = x86_init_noop;
> + x86_init.irqs.pre_vector_init = x86_init_noop;
> + legacy_pic = &null_legacy_pic;
> + }
Sounds good to me, assuming it builds, boots and works! :-)
A couple of extra suggestions:
1)
I'd suggest moving it into its own dedicated, appropriately named
static function, to make it clear that 'ACPI Reduced Hardware' init
happens there.
2)
I'd also initialize it like this:
x86_init.timers.timer_init = x86_init_noop;
x86_init.irqs.pre_vector_init = x86_init_noop;
legacy_pic = &null_legacy_pic;
to make the noop patterns stand out better.
3)
Once all is said and done, please also make acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware
a flag internal to the ACPI code, not exposed to and used by other
bits of x86 code.
> If the above makes sense, I'll send poweroff and reboot change
> together in a seperate patch.
Yeah, please send them in a single series though, so they form a
logical group.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists