[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54FEAC8F.1040206@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:34:23 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...phandler.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release
resources methods
Le 09/03/2015 17:14, Linus Walleij a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
>> The gpiochip_lock_as_irq call can fail and return an error, while the
>> irq_startup is not expected to fail (returns an unsigned int which is not
>> checked by irq core code).
>>
>> irq_request/release_resources functions have been created to address this
>> problem.
>>
>> Move gpiochip_lock/unlock_as_irq calls into
>> irq_request/release_resources functions to prevent using a gpio as an irq
>> if the gpiochip_lock_as_irq call failed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Patch applied with all the ACKs.
Hi Linus,
As suggested earlier, do you think it can be scheduled for the 4.0-rc
phase as a "fix"?
Bye,
> Happy new year J-C!
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists