[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150310122652.GA17573@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:26:52 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Cc: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] efi: Capsule update with user helper interface
On Fri, 06 Mar, at 04:39:12PM, Peter Jones wrote:
>
> So again: do we really need or want to do this?
One thing that we totally lose the ability to do is use the capsule
interface for things *other* than firmware updates, e.g.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/16/327
Also, requiring embedded or custom OS to include fwupdate into their
existing boot solutions is a bit heavy handed when literally all they
want to do is cat a binary blob to a sysfs file.
I don't see why we can't have both solutions.
Another thing is that ESRT isn't going to be supported by every
platform.
So, for the sysfs interface, let's not allow loading from /lib. Let's
not require a userland tool. Let's just do,
# echo /path/to/my/awesome/capsule.bin > /sys/../capsule
and be done with it.
Hmmm?
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists