| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150310141702.GA6607@bbox> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:17:02 +0800 From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@....com> To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> Cc: corbet@....net, trivial@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] README: make the README agnostic to version numbers On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:34:50AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > Personally I don't think the "4.x" numbers add anything to the > understanding of the document. Maybe the reason you think so is that you are quite familiar with the kernel, but we should also take care of the ones who are not familiar with it. For example, usually, README is the first file for these people to read, with version numbers in README, then one will acquire which era the kenrel is currently in. > And anyway, Linus doesn't update them to > 4.0, 4.1, etc per release, so it's not a real release file. > Even so, i still believe that's helpful with version number references in README. > > True, changing this file every 4 years or so isn't a big deal. But > Linux doesn't do _big_ changes any more, so whether its "3.x", "4.x", or > "x.y", the use cases and release notes are the same. Well, personally, i really don't think so. -- Yaowei > > -- > Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists