| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1426000735-14375-3-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:18:52 +0000
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] arm-cci: Abstract the CCI400 PMU speicific definitions
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
CCI400 has different event specifications for PMU, for revsion
0 and revision 1. As of now, we check the revision every single
time before using the parameters for the PMU. This patch abstracts
the details of the pmu models in a struct (cci_pmu_model) and
stores the information in cci_pmu at initialisation time, avoiding
multiple probe operations.
Changes since V2:
- Cleanup event validation(pmu_validate_hw_event). Get rid of
helper functions:
pmu_is_valid_slave_event
pmu_is_valid_master_event
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
---
drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index ea39fc2..f88383e 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -79,19 +79,38 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_matches[] = {
#define CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS 5 /* CCI PMU has 4 counters + 1 cycle counter */
+/* Types of interfaces that can generate events */
+enum {
+ CCI_IF_SLAVE,
+ CCI_IF_MASTER,
+ CCI_IF_MAX,
+};
+
+struct event_range {
+ u32 min;
+ u32 max;
+};
+
struct cci_pmu_hw_events {
struct perf_event *events[CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS];
unsigned long used_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS)];
raw_spinlock_t pmu_lock;
};
+struct cci_pmu_model {
+ char *name;
+ struct event_range event_ranges[CCI_IF_MAX];
+};
+
+static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[];
+
struct cci_pmu {
void __iomem *base;
struct pmu pmu;
int nr_irqs;
int irqs[CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS];
unsigned long active_irqs;
- struct pmu_port_event_ranges *port_ranges;
+ const struct cci_pmu_model *model;
struct cci_pmu_hw_events hw_events;
struct platform_device *plat_device;
int num_events;
@@ -152,53 +171,11 @@ enum cci400_perf_events {
#define CCI_REV_R1_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV 0x00
#define CCI_REV_R1_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV 0x11
-struct pmu_port_event_ranges {
- u8 slave_min;
- u8 slave_max;
- u8 master_min;
- u8 master_max;
-};
-
-static struct pmu_port_event_ranges port_event_range[] = {
- [CCI_REV_R0] = {
- .slave_min = CCI_REV_R0_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV,
- .slave_max = CCI_REV_R0_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV,
- .master_min = CCI_REV_R0_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV,
- .master_max = CCI_REV_R0_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV,
- },
- [CCI_REV_R1] = {
- .slave_min = CCI_REV_R1_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV,
- .slave_max = CCI_REV_R1_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV,
- .master_min = CCI_REV_R1_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV,
- .master_max = CCI_REV_R1_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV,
- },
-};
-
-/*
- * Export different PMU names for the different revisions so userspace knows
- * because the event ids are different
- */
-static char *const pmu_names[] = {
- [CCI_REV_R0] = "CCI_400",
- [CCI_REV_R1] = "CCI_400_r1",
-};
-
-static int pmu_is_valid_slave_event(u8 ev_code)
-{
- return pmu->port_ranges->slave_min <= ev_code &&
- ev_code <= pmu->port_ranges->slave_max;
-}
-
-static int pmu_is_valid_master_event(u8 ev_code)
-{
- return pmu->port_ranges->master_min <= ev_code &&
- ev_code <= pmu->port_ranges->master_max;
-}
-
static int pmu_validate_hw_event(u8 hw_event)
{
u8 ev_source = CCI_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE(hw_event);
u8 ev_code = CCI_PMU_EVENT_CODE(hw_event);
+ int if_type;
switch (ev_source) {
case CCI_PORT_S0:
@@ -207,18 +184,22 @@ static int pmu_validate_hw_event(u8 hw_event)
case CCI_PORT_S3:
case CCI_PORT_S4:
/* Slave Interface */
- if (pmu_is_valid_slave_event(ev_code))
- return hw_event;
+ if_type = CCI_IF_SLAVE;
break;
case CCI_PORT_M0:
case CCI_PORT_M1:
case CCI_PORT_M2:
/* Master Interface */
- if (pmu_is_valid_master_event(ev_code))
- return hw_event;
+ if_type = CCI_IF_MASTER;
break;
+ default:
+ return -ENOENT;
}
+ if (ev_code >= pmu->model->event_ranges[if_type].min &&
+ ev_code <= pmu->model->event_ranges[if_type].max)
+ return hw_event;
+
return -ENOENT;
}
@@ -234,11 +215,9 @@ static int probe_cci_revision(void)
return CCI_REV_R1;
}
-static struct pmu_port_event_ranges *port_range_by_rev(void)
+static const struct cci_pmu_model *probe_cci_model(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- int rev = probe_cci_revision();
-
- return &port_event_range[rev];
+ return &cci_pmu_models[probe_cci_revision()];
}
static int pmu_is_valid_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, int idx)
@@ -807,9 +786,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group *pmu_attr_groups[] = {
static int cci_pmu_init(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- char *name = pmu_names[probe_cci_revision()];
+ char *name = cci_pmu->model->name;
cci_pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
- .name = pmu_names[probe_cci_revision()],
+ .name = cci_pmu->model->name,
.task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context,
.pmu_enable = cci_pmu_enable,
.pmu_disable = cci_pmu_disable,
@@ -862,6 +841,35 @@ static struct notifier_block cci_pmu_cpu_nb = {
.priority = CPU_PRI_PERF + 1,
};
+static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
+ [CCI_REV_R0] = {
+ .name = "CCI_400",
+ .event_ranges = {
+ [CCI_IF_SLAVE] = {
+ CCI_REV_R0_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV,
+ CCI_REV_R0_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV,
+ },
+ [CCI_IF_MASTER] = {
+ CCI_REV_R0_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV,
+ CCI_REV_R0_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ [CCI_REV_R1] = {
+ .name = "CCI_400_r1",
+ .event_ranges = {
+ [CCI_IF_SLAVE] = {
+ CCI_REV_R1_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV,
+ CCI_REV_R1_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV,
+ },
+ [CCI_IF_MASTER] = {
+ CCI_REV_R1_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV,
+ CCI_REV_R1_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_pmu_matches[] = {
{
.compatible = "arm,cci-400-pmu",
@@ -869,6 +877,16 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_pmu_matches[] = {
{},
};
+static inline const struct cci_pmu_model *get_cci_model(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ const struct of_device_id *match = of_match_node(arm_cci_pmu_matches,
+ pdev->dev.of_node);
+ if (!match)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return probe_cci_model(pdev);
+}
+
static bool is_duplicate_irq(int irq, int *irqs, int nr_irqs)
{
int i;
@@ -884,11 +902,19 @@ static int cci_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct resource *res;
int i, ret, irq;
+ const struct cci_pmu_model *model;
+
+ model = get_cci_model(pdev);
+ if (!model) {
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "CCI PMU version not supported\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
pmu = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmu)
return -ENOMEM;
+ pmu->model = model;
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
pmu->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
if (IS_ERR(pmu->base))
@@ -920,12 +946,6 @@ static int cci_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -EINVAL;
}
- pmu->port_ranges = port_range_by_rev();
- if (!pmu->port_ranges) {
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "CCI PMU version not supported\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
raw_spin_lock_init(&pmu->hw_events.pmu_lock);
mutex_init(&pmu->reserve_mutex);
atomic_set(&pmu->active_events, 0);
@@ -939,6 +959,7 @@ static int cci_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ pr_info("ARM %s PMU driver probed", pmu->model->name);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists