[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150310154610.GP8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:46:11 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
YH Chen <yh.chen@...iatek.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>,
Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Yingjoe Chen <Yingjoe.Chen@...iatek.com>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: mediatek: Add PMIC wrapper for MT8135 and
MT8173 SoCs
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + pwrap_writel(wrp, i, PWRAP_SIDLY);
> + pwrap_read(wrp, PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST, &rdata);
> + printk("%s: 0x%04x\n", __func__, rdata);
Is this really ready for submission, or is this just a hidden oversight?
What I tend to do with such debugging is _not_ to indent it at all, which
means when the file is reviewed before sending it out (or indeed, when
diffing it to review the updates before committing those changes or an
amendment to the previous commit) that it sticks out like a sore thumb.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists