[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F5017A7F-0EA2-41B3-A9DD-6123CCFD36FA@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:13:46 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] devicetree: bindings: Document qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id
On Mar 9, 2015, at 7:11 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2015 14:37:52 Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 7:59 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The top level qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id are utilized by bootloaders
>>>>>>>> on Qualcomm MSM platforms to determine which device tree should be
>>>>>>>> utilized and passed to the kernel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cc: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this the special magic that allows qcom bootloaders to take a kernel
>>>>>>> plus multiple DTBs and figure out which DTB to pass?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a bummer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Luckily, the solution for upstream is still quite simple: Provide only
>>>>> one devicetree, and it'll be used, right?
>>>>
>>>> We can provide only one, we still need the IDs in the DT.
>>>
>>> How are the DTS provided? Concatenated with the kernel, or in a
>>> wrapped data format? Or in a separate partition from the kernel?
>>
>> Its a wrapped data format that is than concatenated with the kernel if I remember correctly.
>
> Then you should be able to create a tool that can write this concatenated
> format and insert these properties from a table that matches the boot
> loader, right?
>
> Arnd
Are you suggesting the tool insert the properties in the DT? I’m not sure I understand what the point of doing that would be.
- k
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists