[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3A588B25-66ED-4BB5-8C8F-D050D8A2F9F3@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:10:08 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] devicetree: bindings: Document qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id
>>>>>>>>> The top level qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id are utilized by bootloaders
>>>>>>>>>> on Qualcomm MSM platforms to determine which device tree should be
>>>>>>>>>> utilized and passed to the kernel.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this the special magic that allows qcom bootloaders to take a kernel
>>>>>>>>> plus multiple DTBs and figure out which DTB to pass?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a bummer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Luckily, the solution for upstream is still quite simple: Provide only
>>>>>>> one devicetree, and it'll be used, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can provide only one, we still need the IDs in the DT.
>>>>>
>>>>> How are the DTS provided? Concatenated with the kernel, or in a
>>>>> wrapped data format? Or in a separate partition from the kernel?
>>>>
>>>> Its a wrapped data format that is than concatenated with the kernel if I remember correctly.
>>>
>>> Then you should be able to create a tool that can write this concatenated
>>> format and insert these properties from a table that matches the boot
>>> loader, right?
>>>
>>> Arnd
>>
>> Are you suggesting the tool insert the properties in the DT? I’m not sure I understand what the point of doing that would be.
>
> To insert platform-local properties that mean nothing outside of the
> firmware packaging of the device trees, which is the case here?
>
> I think the idea of having the installer script inserting them is
> quite reasonable in this case.
>
>
> -Olof
These values are static, so not sure what the point of having the installer script do that?
- k
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists