[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150310223713.GA17773@amt.cnet>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:37:13 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: svm: make wbinvd faster
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01:31PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2015-03-09 20:28-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 06:19:18PM -0600, Joel Schopp wrote:
> > > From: David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@....com>
> > > No need to re-decode WBINVD since we know what it is from the intercept.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@....com>
> > > [extracted from larger unlrelated patch, forward ported, tested]
> > > Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com>
> >
> > Can't you disable the intercept if need_emulate_wbinvd(vcpu) == false?
>
> I don't think we want to: it should be faster to intercept and ignore
> than to invalidate all caches. The exit doesn't affect other physical
> cores and costs just about 10(?) L3 cache misses.
Yes, right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists