linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] seq-buf/ftrace: Various fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150309220348.26d24fb8@grimm.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 22:03:48 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] seq-buf/ftrace: Various fixes

On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 18:43:54 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:


> Oh. Ok. I didn't pull that, simply because in the same thread you said
> you were going to fix the other case that Joe pointed out and you said
> "I'll make another patch". So I dismissed your previous pull request
> as premature..

Yeah I figured as much. But right after I did that fix, the other bug
was reported to me. I decided to fix that bug before posting again, and
that took a bit longer than I expected.

Sorry for the confusion, I didn't explain it very well. I should have
stated this is the new update to my previous pull request with another
bug fix included as well.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/