[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150311074309.GA5689@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:43:09 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:58:42PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible
> <snip>
> > >
> > > That's a nice cleanup, but it's not even the correct cleanup.
> >
> > Oops, sorry, it is the correct cleanup, I was looking at the '*'
> > placement, not the const part.
> >
> > but the patch needs to be redone, I'll just go fix up the build warnings
> > for now...
>
> thanks Greg for your patience and time to redo this patch. I saw you
> broke it into two - three different patches.
> But just one doubt, was your compiler showing any warning for the
> patch - "Staging: sm750fb: provide error path for
> hw_sm750le_setBLANK()" , commit id -
> e74ac550298ec4635cc32e99f966568a808fd370 . my compiler didnot show
> any warning for that.
> mine is gcc 4.7.3, is it time to update?
Yes it is, that's a really old version of gcc. Also please wrap your
email lines at 72 columns :)
> thanks again, and sorry that you had to do fix this. I should have
> made the patches in a more proper way.
Not a problem, it's part of the learning process.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists