[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150311085433.GU10964@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:54:33 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] staging: sm750fb: Use memset_io instead of memset
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:28:40AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> This patch uses memset_io instead of memset when using memset on __iomem
> qualified pointers. This fixes the following sparse warnings:-
>
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:489:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:490:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:501:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:502:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:833:5: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:1154:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
When I see a patch like this, then I worry, "What if the Sparse
annotations are wrong? The patch description doesn't say anything about
that." After review then I think the annotations are correct so that's
fine.
Btw, do you have this hardware? Are you able to test these changes?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists