[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBJK_pjtvE0GV-7B_qpS+0=Q00bweE0Gs=SCeEbMA6cKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:10:48 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/11] sched: consolidation of CPU capacity and usage
On 27 February 2015 at 16:54, Vincent Guittot
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
> This patchset consolidates several changes in the capacity and the usage
> tracking of the CPU. It provides a frequency invariant metric of the usage of
> CPUs and generally improves the accuracy of load/usage tracking in the
> scheduler. The frequency invariant metric is the foundation required for the
> consolidation of cpufreq and implementation of a fully invariant load tracking.
> These are currently WIP and require several changes to the load balancer
> (including how it will use and interprets load and capacity metrics) and
> extensive validation. The frequency invariance is done with
> arch_scale_freq_capacity and this patchset doesn't provide the backends of
> the function which are architecture dependent.
>
> As discussed at LPC14, Morten and I have consolidated our changes into a single
> patchset to make it easier to review and merge.
>
> During load balance, the scheduler evaluates the number of tasks that a group
> of CPUs can handle. The current method assumes that tasks have a fix load of
> SCHED_LOAD_SCALE and CPUs have a default capacity of SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE.
> This assumption generates wrong decision by creating ghost cores or by
> removing real ones when the original capacity of CPUs is different from the
> default SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE. With this patch set, we don't try anymore to
> evaluate the number of available cores based on the group_capacity but instead
> we evaluate the usage of a group and compare it with its capacity.
>
> This patchset mainly replaces the old capacity_factor method by a new one and
> keeps the general policy almost unchanged. These new metrics will be also used
> in later patches.
>
> The CPU usage is based on a running time tracking version of the current
> implementation of the load average tracking. I also have a version that is
> based on the new implementation proposal [1] but I haven't provide the patches
> and results as [1] is still under review. I can provide change above [1] to
> change how CPU usage is computed and to adapt to new mecanism.
>
> Change since V9
> - add a dedicated patch for removing unused capacity_orig
> - update some comments and fix typo
> - change the condition for actively migrating task on CPU with higher capacity
>
> Change since V8
> - reorder patches
>
> Change since V7
> - add freq invariance for usage tracking
> - add freq invariance for scale_rt
> - update comments and commits' message
> - fix init of utilization_avg_contrib
> - fix prefer_sibling
>
> Change since V6
> - add group usage tracking
> - fix some commits' messages
> - minor fix like comments and argument order
>
> Change since V5
> - remove patches that have been merged since v5 : patches 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 07
> - update commit log and add more details on the purpose of the patches
> - fix/remove useless code with the rebase on patchset [2]
> - remove capacity_orig in sched_group_capacity as it is not used
> - move code in the right patch
> - add some helper function to factorize code
>
> Change since V4
> - rebase to manage conflicts with changes in selection of busiest group
>
> Change since V3:
> - add usage_avg_contrib statistic which sums the running time of tasks on a rq
> - use usage_avg_contrib instead of runnable_avg_sum for cpu_utilization
> - fix replacement power by capacity
> - update some comments
>
> Change since V2:
> - rebase on top of capacity renaming
> - fix wake_affine statistic update
> - rework nohz_kick_needed
> - optimize the active migration of a task from CPU with reduced capacity
> - rename group_activity by group_utilization and remove unused total_utilization
> - repair SD_PREFER_SIBLING and use it for SMT level
> - reorder patchset to gather patches with same topics
>
> Change since V1:
> - add 3 fixes
> - correct some commit messages
> - replace capacity computation by activity
> - take into account current cpu capacity
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/131
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/25/589
>
> Morten Rasmussen (2):
> sched: Track group sched_entity usage contributions
> sched: Make sched entity usage tracking scale-invariant
>
> Vincent Guittot (9):
> sched: add utilization_avg_contrib
> sched: remove frequency scaling from cpu_capacity
> sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency
> sched: add per rq cpu_capacity_orig
> sched: get CPU's usage statistic
> sched: replace capacity_factor by usage
> sched; remove unused capacity_orig from
> sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level
> sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity
>
> include/linux/sched.h | 21 ++-
> kernel/sched/core.c | 15 +--
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 12 +-
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 366 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 15 ++-
> 5 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Hi Peter,
Gentle reminder ping
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists