[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150311124620.GC28806@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:46:20 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Chen Fan <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Howard Chen <ibanezchen@...il.com>,
"Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: mediatek: add Mediatek cpufreq driver
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:16:42PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I think until the time we revive the voltage-domain stuff we need to support
> mediatek's driver. And probably a virtual regulator is the best approach
> unless someone else comes up with another idea.
Why not just write a custom cpufreq driver if it's too hard to abstract?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists