[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550052CD.5040303@plexistor.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:35:57 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kill kmemcheck
On 03/11/2015 03:39 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 08:40 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:34:46 -0400
>> Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Fair enough. We knew there are existing kmemcheck users, but KASan should be
>>>> superior both in performance and the scope of bugs it finds. It also shouldn't
>>>> impose new limitations beyond requiring gcc 4.9.2+.
>>>>
>> Ouch! OK, then I can't use it. I'm currently compiling with gcc 4.6.3.
>>
>> It will be a while before I upgrade my build farm to something newer.
>
> Are you actually compiling new kernels with 4.6.3, or are you using older
> kernels as well?
>
> There's no real hurry to kill kmemcheck right now, but we do want to stop
> supporting that in favour of KASan.
>
Just my $0.017 for me I wish there was the single config MEM_CHECK and
the new or old would be selected automatically depending on enabling
factors, for example gcc version, if arch dependent and so on.
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists