[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54FF9C0F.3060107@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:36:15 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index()
On 2015/3/11 6:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> If dev is NULL in __gpiod_get_index() and both ACPI and OF are
> enabled, it will be checked twice before the code decides to give
> up with DT/ACPI lookup, so avoid that.
>
> Also use the observation that ACPI_COMPANION() is much more efficient
> than ACPI_HANDLE(), because the latter uses the former and carries out
> a check and a pointer dereference on top of it, so replace the
> ACPI_HANDLE() check with an ACPI_COMPANION() one which does not
> require the additional IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) check too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Quite straight forward to me, for both two patches,
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Thanks
Hanjun
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1865,13 +1865,15 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check __gpiod_g
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "GPIO lookup for consumer %s\n", con_id);
>
> - /* Using device tree? */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev && dev->of_node) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
> - desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> - } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && dev && ACPI_HANDLE(dev)) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
> - desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> + if (dev) {
> + /* Using device tree? */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
> + desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> + } else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
> + desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists