linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] staging: sm750fb: Remove spinlock helper function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA5enKZGrfQPPigvVHFoN6hS7gruL_93j2-sVvRPgqCmEkxR=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:03:39 +0000
From:	Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:	teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] staging: sm750fb: Remove spinlock helper function

On 11 March 2015 at 14:58, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
>
> tested the whole series on hardware, looks ok.
>

Great!

> now it depends on Greg if he wants to accept patches with such big
> commit logs, and another problem he will face is to get some patches from
> this thread and some from the old thread.
> (while testing i faced this problem to maintain the sequence of
>  patches)

I am more than happy to resend the whole series as necessary if that
makes it easier for Greg or anyone else :) I have previously
resubmitted an entire patch series only for people to find the v2
resubmits of unchanged code to be confusing. I am absolutely happy to
do whatever works for Greg of course!

Best,

-- 
Lorenzo Stoakes
https:/ljs.io
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/