lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550062E7.3090603@arm.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:44:39 +0000
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure

Hi Boris,

On 11/03/15 13:36, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 02:35:12PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> My initial assumption was that it will be NULL for Intel processors
>> and hence I assigned cacheinfo->priv to nb pointer unconditionally. So
>> I don't have any strong opinion here.
>
> Right, we need the NB descriptor on AMD to do L3-specific operations,
> see amd_l3_disable_index() for an example.
>
> IOW, I ended up committing this:
>

It looks fine to me except one unwanted/incorrect line in the commit log 
as mentioned below. I gave it a spin on my i7 box and it works.
Thanks for the fix up.

> ---
> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:54:29 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/cacheinfo: Fix cache_get_priv_group() for Intel
>   processors
>
> The private pointer provided by the cacheinfo code is used to implement
> the AMD L3 cache-specific attributes using a pointer to the northbridge
> descriptor. It is needed for performing L3-specific operations and for
> that we need a couple of PCI devices and other service information, all
> contained in the northbridge descriptor.
>
> However, it's populated even on Intel processors for an L3 cache.

After testing this patch, I think I had misunderstood before and it's
not populated on Intel processors, so you can drop the line above.

Regards,
Sudeep

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ