[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55006668.20202@brocade.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:59:36 +0000
From: Brian Russell <brian.russell@...cade.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Brian Russell <brussell@...cade.com>
CC: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio: Fix uio driver to refcount device
On 11/03/15 15:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:31:42PM +0000, Brian Russell wrote:
>> Protect uio driver from crashing if its owner is hot unplugged while there
>> are open fds.
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Russell <brussell@...cade.com>
>
> Minor nit, you need a blank line before your s-o-b: line.
>
Ack.
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/uio/uio.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio.c b/drivers/uio/uio.c
>> index 6276f13..70ce015 100644
>> --- a/drivers/uio/uio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/uio/uio.c
>> @@ -434,9 +434,11 @@ static int uio_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> + get_device(idev);
>
> What is the real oops caused when a device is removed? Protecting this
> with a reference count seems ok, but it seems "heavy".
>
I'm seeing it with PCI hotplug. The PCI subsystem calls remove and the owner module in turn calls uio_unregister_device while app stil has open fds.
Brian
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists