[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150311173346.GB5032@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:33:46 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Riikonen <priikone@....fi>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu: avoid math_state_restore() on kthread exec
Hello.
This should "fix" the kernel crash observed by Dave.
But let me repeat once again, the problem is that fpu_finit() is buggy
on Dave's machine. This series should "hide" this problem, we need to
fix it later anyway.
I was going to do these changes anyway, math_state_restore() was only
used because we did not have the necessary helpers. I was going to start
with init_fpu() cleanups, but since math_state_restore() makes this
fpu_finit() bug more visible lets remove it first.
Note that init_fpu() + user_fpu_begin() is racy, used_math() is already
set so __switch_to() in between can do restore_fpu_checking() too and
trigger the same GPF. But this is fine (to some degree), the task won't
be killed. And this is just another proof that init_fpu() should not
set used_math() and it and its users need more cleanups.
More to come tomorrow.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists