linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] ARM: dts: sun6i: hummingbird: Enable the onboard WiFi module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v66zJcBBpLZFjNyugjRzt8SppQ0VbFD+pMqVYdK4EKg-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:11:49 +0800
From:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] ARM: dts: sun6i: hummingbird: Enable the onboard
 WiFi module

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:59:24PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> The Hummingbird A31 has an AMPAK AP6210 WiFi+Bluetooth module. The
>> WiFi part is a BCM43362 IC connected to MMC1 in the A31 SoC via SDIO.
>> The IC also takes a power enable signal via GPIO. This is supported
>> with the new power sequencing bindings.
>>
>> The WiFi module supports out-of-band interrupt signaling via GPIO,
>> but this is buggy and not enabled yet.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>
> There's two almost identical patches 12/12. Which one am I suppose to
> apply?

This one is the right one. I forgot to clear the patches after changing
the description. The "buggy" part in the description is probably not
needed. Hans explained that the SD resets have nothing to do with
interrupt handling.


ChenYu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/