[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3142298.YeoA7WAayD@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:47:30 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Arun Ramamurthy <arun.ramamurthy@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Anatol Pomazau <anatol@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: usbphy: Add dt documentation for Broadcom Cygnus USB PHY driver
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 14:37:58 Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
> On 15-03-10 01:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 16:24:06 Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
> >>>>> Should I run this by Alan Stern?
> >>>>
> >>>> I've added him to Cc here. He clearly didn't know the background about
> >>>> the DT binding change, and should not need to, but he may have an opinion
> >>>> on what names we should use.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> Arnd, should I re patch the ehci-platform driver to avoid phy-names
> >> entirely? Alan, if not do you have an opinion on what the usb phy names
> >> should be? The current patch uses "usbp" + port number such as "usbp0" ,
> >> "usbp1" etc
> >
> > I think avoiding the phy names would be best here, but it requires a
> > kernel API change first, because we do not have a way to get a phy
> > by index as we do for other subsystems (e.g. clocks or gpios).
> >
> Arnd , there is an existing api _of_phy_get that gets a phy by index.
> However it is not exported and is called from of_phy_get which is in
> turn called from devm_of_phy_get.
>
> My plan is to create a new function maybe devm_of_phy_get_by_index that
> calls _of_phy_get directly? What are your thoughts?
Sounds good to me.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists