[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5500C352.2060104@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:02 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations
On 03/11/2015 04:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The second patch is the first step in the transition plan. It changes
> the default but it is NOT an upstream material. It is aimed for brave
> testers who can cope with failures. I have talked to Andrew and he
> was willing to keep that patch in mmotm tree. It would be even better
> to have this in linux-next because the testing coverage would be even
> bigger. Dave Chinner has also shown an interest to integrate this into
> his xfstest farm. It would be great if Fenguang could add it into the
> zero testing project too (if the pushing the patch into linux-next
> would be too controversial).
Stuff in mmotm automatically end up in linux-next.
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists