linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:02 -0400
From:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations

On 03/11/2015 04:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The second patch is the first step in the transition plan. It changes
> the default but it is NOT an upstream material. It is aimed for brave
> testers who can cope with failures. I have talked to Andrew and he
> was willing to keep that patch in mmotm tree. It would be even better
> to have this in linux-next because the testing coverage would be even
> bigger. Dave Chinner has also shown an interest to integrate this into
> his xfstest farm. It would be great if Fenguang could add it into the
> zero testing project too (if the pushing the patch into linux-next
> would be too controversial).

Stuff in mmotm automatically end up in linux-next.


Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/