linux-kernel - Re: [rhashtable] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150311.234156.247575265894541661.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:41:56 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	fengguang.wu@...el.com, lkp@...org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: [rhashtable] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:37:45 +1100

> rhashtable: Add annotation to nested lock
>     
> Commit aa34a6cb0478842452bac58edb50d3ef9e178c92 ("rhashtable:
> Add arbitrary rehash function") killed the annotation on the
> nested lock which leads to bitching from lockdep.
>     
> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

This doesn't apply to net-next, the second hunk gives a reject.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/